46 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
46 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id:
|
|
aliases: []
|
|
title: Gold Plating
|
|
tags:
|
|
- authorship/original
|
|
- destiny/permanent
|
|
- status/complete
|
|
- topic/construction
|
|
- topic/construction/electrical
|
|
- topic/risk
|
|
- type/encyclopedia-entry
|
|
dg-publish: true
|
|
---
|
|
# Gold Plating
|
|
|
|
Gold plating, also "overengineering", is the frustratingly common design practice
|
|
of arbitrarily requiring components or methods far more stringent than typical.
|
|
|
|
In [[construction-estimating]],
|
|
such cases quickly reveal every error of assumption made by the estimator.
|
|
|
|
> [!example] Aluminum Feeders ILO Copper
|
|
> The typical value engineering option for electrical installations
|
|
> is to use aluminum wiring in lieu of copper above a certain size.
|
|
> Assuming competent installation,
|
|
> such an option is strictly functionally equal to the design.
|
|
> There is _no_ difference to capacity, future expansion, or long-term maintenance.
|
|
> Moreover, the substitution is invisible to the client,
|
|
> such that they would have to employ an electrician
|
|
> to determine whether it had been taken.
|
|
|
|
Such issues are usually VE'd out of scope before award.
|
|
It often goes that projects are designed in gold,
|
|
but built in cardboard.
|
|
|
|
Clients tend to want the highest end---
|
|
and design firms are incentivized to provide---
|
|
but seeing the bill tends to reorganize priorities.
|
|
|
|
For some owners, though, money is no object,
|
|
and standardization is far more important
|
|
than any potential construction savings.
|
|
These owners can be expected to decline
|
|
every value engineering option offered.
|