vault backup: 2026-04-09 10:52:03
This commit is contained in:
+2
-1
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
|
||||
"isLeftHanded": false,
|
||||
"desktopUIMode": "full",
|
||||
"tabletUIMode": "compact",
|
||||
"phoneUIMode": "mobile",
|
||||
"iframeMatchExcalidrawTheme": true,
|
||||
"matchTheme": true,
|
||||
"matchThemeAlways": true,
|
||||
@@ -112,7 +113,7 @@
|
||||
"library2": {
|
||||
"type": "excalidrawlib",
|
||||
"version": 2,
|
||||
"source": "https://github.com/zsviczian/obsidian-excalidraw-plugin/releases/tag/2.20.2",
|
||||
"source": "https://github.com/zsviczian/obsidian-excalidraw-plugin/releases/tag/2.21.2",
|
||||
"libraryItems": []
|
||||
},
|
||||
"imageElementNotice": true,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id:
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 1000 Virginia
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- occupational/project
|
||||
- status/incomplete
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 1000 Virginia
|
||||
|
||||
Project Status: Warranty
|
||||
Region: DIV-4 Dan Bacon
|
||||
Building Type: High Rise
|
||||
Contract Type: Design Build
|
||||
Units: 454
|
||||
Square Feet: 545,051
|
||||
Start Date: 02/09/2021
|
||||
End Date: 12/05/2023
|
||||
Contract Amount: $19,852,516
|
||||
|
||||
1000 Virginia Ave Seattle, WA 98109
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,3 +17,5 @@ Real example of [[location-vs-scope]]:
|
||||
Project is two buildings: Residential and Hotel,
|
||||
entirely separate physically and electrically.
|
||||
Generators for both are located on a lower roof of Residential.
|
||||
|
||||
![[location-vs-scope_2.excalidraw]]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ and are thus a different class entirely
|
||||
from those I'm most familiar with.
|
||||
I choose to criticize decomposition generally despite this
|
||||
because the distinction is rarely acknowledged by its advocates
|
||||
so "decomposition = good" pervades the estimating zeitgeist completely
|
||||
so "decomposition = good" pervades the estimating zeitgeist completely,
|
||||
and I get baffled, horrified, or patronizing looks when I suggest
|
||||
that complete quantity takeoff may not be more accurate
|
||||
than a parametric budget that could be completed in a day.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,13 +17,27 @@ yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-08 07:42:17
|
||||
|
||||
## _HTMAiPM_ Reference Class Forecasting (RCF)
|
||||
|
||||
[[hubbard_2025_project-management#Top-down Estimations Reference Class Forecasting]]
|
||||
|
||||
If RCF isn't informative (uniqueness bias)
|
||||
then neither is project manager experience.
|
||||
%%
|
||||
blockquote syntax below is use to indicate paraphrased quotes.
|
||||
standard paragraphs are my extrapolation.
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
A **loss exceedance curve** can inform how to price a project under estimate uncertainty.
|
||||
Contingency can be added to an estimate made with standard methods
|
||||
sufficient to lower probability of overrun to 5%, for example.
|
||||
RCF can avoid potentially faulty scaling
|
||||
(square foot area, number of dwelling/sleeping units)
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
> If RCF isn't informative (uniqueness bias)
|
||||
> then neither is project manager experience.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
|
||||
> A **loss exceedance curve** can inform how to price a project under estimate uncertainty.
|
||||
> Contingency can be added to an estimate made with standard methods
|
||||
> sufficient to lower probability of overrun to 5%, for example.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-08T11:53:07-04:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-08 11:53:07
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/periodic/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
date-created: 2026-04-08T11:53:07-04:00
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-08]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W15]]"
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-08 11:53:07
|
||||
|
||||
## NFM Lending Lunch & Learn
|
||||
|
||||
"The Cost of Waiting: Building Wealth through Homeownership"
|
||||
|
||||
NFM Lending,
|
||||
"The Jane Floyd Team"
|
||||
|
||||
### NFM Lending Power Design Incentive
|
||||
|
||||
\$2,000 credit to closing cost
|
||||
|
||||
Good year for buying?
|
||||
|
||||
### Components of Preapproval
|
||||
|
||||
* Credit
|
||||
* Income
|
||||
* Assets
|
||||
|
||||
#### Credit
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Credit Bureaus
|
||||
> * Experian
|
||||
> * Equifax
|
||||
> * Transunion
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum 580 for FHA, VA
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum 620 for conventional
|
||||
(assumes a large down payment)
|
||||
|
||||
> [!info] Score Drivers
|
||||
> * Pay history
|
||||
> * Credit utilization
|
||||
> * Past Derogatories
|
||||
|
||||
#### Income
|
||||
|
||||
Bonus, commission, overtime
|
||||
2-year history with letter from employer
|
||||
stating likely to continue
|
||||
|
||||
#### Assets
|
||||
|
||||
##### Traditional
|
||||
|
||||
Savings
|
||||
|
||||
401k personal loans
|
||||
|
||||
Gift funds - documentation required
|
||||
sent directly to title company
|
||||
|
||||
##### Sourcing and Seasoning
|
||||
|
||||
Bank deposits
|
||||
cash is never an option
|
||||
deposits need to be sourced (documented)
|
||||
large undocumented deposits need to be seasoned for two months
|
||||
|
||||
### Assistance Programs
|
||||
|
||||
* 1st time home buyer programs: Statewide, county
|
||||
|
||||
### Personal Family Budget
|
||||
|
||||
* Nerd Wallet
|
||||
* WalletHub
|
||||
|
||||
### Rent vs. Own
|
||||
|
||||
Mortgage Coach
|
||||
|
||||
### Cost of Waiting
|
||||
|
||||
If interest rates decrease
|
||||
payment decreases marginally,
|
||||
but you lose out on equity
|
||||
|
||||
better to buy now and refinance when rates decrease.
|
||||
|
||||
> 1% rate decrease $\approx$ \$10,000 value appreciation
|
||||
|
||||
### "Escrow"
|
||||
|
||||
Escrow account with title company
|
||||
"opening escrow"
|
||||
|
||||
separate from escrow account with lender for taxes, insurance, etc.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-08T13:53:59-04:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-08 13:53:59
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/periodic/timestamped
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-08]]"
|
||||
date-created: 2026-04-08T13:53:59-04:00
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W15]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-08 13:53:59
|
||||
|
||||
> [!quote] [[hubbard_2025_project-management#Conflating Uncertainty with Knowing Nothing]] (text decoration added)
|
||||
> An assumption is a statement we treat as true for the sake of argument, regardless of whether it is true.
|
||||
> Assumptions are necessary if you have to use deterministic accounting methods with exact points as values.
|
||||
> ==You rarely, if ever, know an exact point with certainty,==
|
||||
> ==so any such value must be an assumption.==
|
||||
|
||||
Assumptions are frowned upon in [[construction-estimating]],
|
||||
but they are only made necessary by the insistence on exact values.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-08T16:17:27-04:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-08 16:17:27
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/periodic/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
date-created: 2026-04-08T16:17:27-04:00
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-08]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W15]]"
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-08 16:17:27
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant to [[location-vs-scope]] philosophy
|
||||
for [[virginia-live-casino-and-hotel]]:
|
||||
|
||||
Panels exclusively serving loads in Food & Beverage (FB) areas,
|
||||
which are broken out separately from the larger Casino area,
|
||||
are located in the Casino area.
|
||||
|
||||
Discussing with [[joel-jansen]],
|
||||
he told me to use my best judgement.
|
||||
I told him that _my_ intuition,
|
||||
trained from my time estimating for Ace,
|
||||
is to break down by **scope**,
|
||||
but that [[conest]] usually breaks down by **location**.
|
||||
He agreed that is the preference,
|
||||
and since the previous estimator's breakdowns
|
||||
did not include Building Areas for the FB zones anyway
|
||||
I should put the panels in Casino.
|
||||
|
||||
It is worth noting that he was on his way out the door.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 2026-04-09T09:10:26-04:00
|
||||
aliases: []
|
||||
title: 2026-04-09 09:10:26
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- authorship/original
|
||||
- destiny/permanent
|
||||
- status/draft
|
||||
- type/periodic/timestamped
|
||||
dg-publish: true
|
||||
date-created: 2026-04-09T09:10:26-04:00
|
||||
daily: "[[2026-04-09]]"
|
||||
weekly: "[[2026-W15]]"
|
||||
monthly: "[[2026-04]]"
|
||||
quarterly: "[[2026-Q2]]"
|
||||
yearly: "[[2026]]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
# 2026-04-09 09:10:26
|
||||
|
||||
## 1000 Virginia GP Variance
|
||||
|
||||
[[1000-virginia]] closed $2,950,096 behind target GP.
|
||||
At 14.86% of contract value,
|
||||
it's possible that this variance represents a loss.
|
||||
|
||||
Data grabbed from The Hub last year before I lost access
|
||||
has both sale price and cost at exactly $19,906,645.23.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!aside]
|
||||
> Obviously this is doctored,
|
||||
> which is immensely frustrating,
|
||||
> but irrelevant to this note.
|
||||
|
||||
I do not believe that a $20M job can be mismanaged by $3M.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user