vault backup: 2026-02-25 12:58:18
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
|||||||
|
## 2025-11-13 ??:??:??
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#occupational
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Questions for Bid Estimators
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Questions for [[pdi-estimating#Bid Estimating|PDI Bid Estimators]].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Exclusions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When we send proposals with significant exclusions
|
||||||
|
(no lighting control, no demo, no submetering,
|
||||||
|
even when designed and shown on drawings):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Is there a conversation happening with our customers
|
||||||
|
before they receive our proposal?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Is it clear they understand what we're excluding?
|
||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
|||||||
|
# 2026-01-12 13:02:??
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#occupational
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Joel attributes the [[#GP Variance|apparent variance]] to
|
||||||
|
1. missed Polaris lugs for feeders for one building,
|
||||||
|
2. insufficient budget for equipment rental, and
|
||||||
|
3. upfront costs already paid (construction is 50% complete).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
He also said that operations accused ConEst
|
||||||
|
of providing insufficient length for subfeeds,
|
||||||
|
which he said was true,
|
||||||
|
but not to the extent accused
|
||||||
|
(only ~600ft missed total).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The award WBS shows $32,382 for equipment rental
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'm dubious of all these explanations,
|
||||||
|
but I don't have another one.
|
||||||
|
I can't find the ConEst folder or Accubid file.
|
||||||
@@ -25,21 +25,4 @@ where instrumental methods are presented as if they were realist,
|
|||||||
causing confusion when the methods are,
|
causing confusion when the methods are,
|
||||||
as judged from a realist perspective, wrong.
|
as judged from a realist perspective, wrong.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 2025-11-13 ??:??:??
|
[[2025-11-13_08-19-01]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#occupational
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Questions for Bid Estimators
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Questions for [[pdi-estimating#Bid Estimating|PDI Bid Estimators]].
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Exclusions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When we send proposals with significant exclusions
|
|
||||||
(no lighting control, no demo, no submetering,
|
|
||||||
even when designed and shown on drawings):
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Is there a conversation happening with our customers
|
|
||||||
before they receive our proposal?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Is it clear they understand what we're excluding?
|
|
||||||
@@ -10,24 +10,3 @@ dg-publish: true
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
**Dry utilities:** utilities other than "wet" utilities (water, sewer, stormwater),
|
**Dry utilities:** utilities other than "wet" utilities (water, sewer, stormwater),
|
||||||
namely power, data, and natural gas.
|
namely power, data, and natural gas.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# 2026-01-12 13:02:??
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#occupational
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Joel attributes the [[#GP Variance|apparent variance]] to
|
|
||||||
1. missed Polaris lugs for feeders for one building,
|
|
||||||
2. insufficient budget for equipment rental, and
|
|
||||||
3. upfront costs already paid (construction is 50% complete).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
He also said that operations accused ConEst
|
|
||||||
of providing insufficient length for subfeeds,
|
|
||||||
which he said was true,
|
|
||||||
but not to the extent accused
|
|
||||||
(only ~600ft missed total).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The award WBS shows $32,382 for equipment rental
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I'm dubious of all these explanations,
|
|
||||||
but I don't have another one.
|
|
||||||
I can't find the ConEst folder or Accubid file.
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user